- 96
- 44
It is now Wednesday and @Ninjjer hasn't posted the weekly yet
So anyways here's a gaming thread since I've posted them before. @Aevann please pin
Also Ninjjer says he chooses weekly games mostly at random and is open to suggestions. I've been choosing them randomly too lol so feel free to share if anyone has a future suggestion.
What are you playing currently?
Previous Iterations:
2025
#1 --- 095 - [06 Jan 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #95 -- RWBY
#2--- 096 - [12 Jan 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #96 -- lc
#3--- 097 - [17 Jan 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #97 -- lc
#4--- 098 - [24 Jan 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #98 -- Ninjjer
#5--- 099 - [2 Feb 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #99 -- Ninjjer
#6--- 100 - [9 Feb 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #100 -- Ninjjer
#7--- 101 - [16 Feb 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #101 -- Ninjjer
#8--- 102 - [25 Feb 2025] - Weekly What games are you playing #102 -- RWBY
#9--- 103 - [2 Mar 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #103 -- Ninjjer
#10--- 104 - [9 Mar 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #104 -- Ninjjer
#11--- 105 - [17 Mar 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #105 -- Ninjjer
#12--- 106 - [24 Mar 2025] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #106 -- RWBY
2024
I'm aware the dates aren't exactly right but I like to keep things refered to their planned date. They are still weekly after all.
#1 --- 043 - [07 Jan 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #43 -- mayflyalt
#2 --- 044 - [14 Jan 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #44 -- lc
#3 --- 045 - [21 Jan 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #45 -- lc
#4 --- 046 - [28 Jan 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #46 -- lc
#5 --- 047 - [04 Feb 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #47 -- lc
#6 --- 048 - [11 Feb 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #48 -- lc
#7 --- 049 - [18 Feb 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #49 -- lc
#8 --- 050 - [25 Feb 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #50 -- lc
#9 --- 051 - [03 Mar 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #51 -- lc
#10 --- 052 - [10 Mar 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #52 -- lc
#11 --- 053 - [17 Mar 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #53 -- Ninjjer
#12 --- 054 - [25 Mar 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #54 -- lc
#13 --- 055 - [7 Apr 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #55 -- Ninjjer
#14 --- 056 - [14 Apr 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #56 -- Ninjjer
#15 --- 057 - [21 Apr 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #57 -- Ninjjer
#16 --- 058 - [28 Apr 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #58 -- Ninjjer
#17 --- 059 - [5 May 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #59 -- RWBY
#18 --- 060 - [12 May 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #60 -- Ninjjer
#19 --- 061 - [12 May 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #61 -- Ninjjer
#20 --- 062 - [26 May 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #62 -- Ninjjer
#21 --- 063 - [2 June 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #63 -- RWBY
#22 --- 064 - [9 June 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #64 -- RWBY
#23 --- 065 - [16 June 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #65 -- Ninjjer
#24 --- 066 - [23 June 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #66 -- Ninjjer
#25 --- 067 - [30 June 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #67 -- Ninjjer
#26 --- 068 - [7 July 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #68 -- Ninjjer
#27 --- 069 - [14 July 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #69 -- Ninjjer
#28 --- 070 - [21 July 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #70 -- Ninjjer
#29 --- 071 - [28 July 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #71 -- Ninjjer
#30 --- 072 - [4 Aug 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #72 -- Ninjjer
#31 --- 073 - [11 Aug 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #73 -- Ninjjer
#32 --- 074 - [18 Aug 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #74 -- Ninjjer
#33 --- 075 - [25 Aug 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #75 -- Ninjjer
#34 --- 076 - [1 Sept 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #76 -- Ninjjer
#35 --- 077 - [8 Sept 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #77 -- Ninjjer
#36 --- 078 - [15 Sept 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #78 -- Ninjjer
#37 --- 079 - [22 Sept 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #79 -- Ninjjer
#38 --- 080 - [29 Sept 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #80 -- Ninjjer
#39 --- 081 - [6 Oct 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #81 -- Ninjjer
#40 --- 082 - [13 Oct 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #82 -- Ninjjer
#41 --- 083 - [20 Oct 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #83 -- Ninjjer
#42 --- 084 - [27 Oct 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #84 -- Ninjjer
#43 --- 085 - [03 Nov 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #85 - - Ninjjer
#44 --- 086 - [10 Nov 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #86 - - RWBY
#43 --- 087 - [17 Nov 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #87 - - Ninjjer
#44 --- 088 - [24 Nov 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #88 - - Ninjjer
#45 --- 089 - [1 Dec 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #89 - - Ninjjer
#46 --- 090 - [8 Dec 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #90 - - Ninjjer
#47 --- 091 - [15 Dec 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #91 - - Ninjjer
#48 --- 092 - [22 Dec 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #92 - - Ninjjer
#49 --- 094? - [29 Dec 2024] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #94 - - Ninjjer
2023
I'm aware there are previous weekly or so megathreads and I'll eventually add them ( green = official, red = fake, yellow = misc, blue = losercel)
#0 - [22 Jan 2023] - some1 should make weekly vidya threads marseytf2spy
#1 - [28 Jan 2023] - Weekly "Whatcha Been Playing" Thread #1
#2 - [4 Feb 2023] - Weekly "Whatcha Been Playing" thread #2
#3 - [11 Feb 2023] - Weekly Gaming Thread #3
#3.5 - [13 Feb 2023] - [Weekly Gaming Thread 2] You will own no NFTs of video game microtransactions and you will be happy edition-- dramamine
#4 - [18 Feb 2023] - Weekly 'What're You Playing?' thread #4
#4.5 - [20 Feb 2023] - Welcome to the new weekly vidya thread! Week 1 - 2/20/23 -- robotron2084
#5 - [25 Feb 2023] - Weekly "What're You Playing" Community Thread #5
#5.5 - [2 Mar 2023] - So, what do you dipshits play all day? -- horned waifu shill
#6 - [4 Mar 2023] - Weekly 'What're You Playing' Thread #6
#7 - [11 Mar 2023] - Weekly 'What're you playing?' thread #7
#8 - [18 Mar 2023] - Weekly 'What're you playing?' Thread #8
#9 - [25 Mar 2023] - Weekly 'What're You Playing?' thread #9
#10 - [1 Apr 2023] - Weekly 'What are you playing?' Thread: #10: Whooaaaa Those are some HILARIOUS patch notes edition
#11 - [8 Apr 2023] - Weekly 'What are you playing' Thread #11
#12 - [15 Apr 2023] - Weekly 'What are you playing' thread #12
#13 - [23 Apr 2023] - What're you playing thread #idk
#14 - [29 Apr 2023] - Weekly 'What Are You Playing' thread #14
#15(1) - [6 May 2023] - Weekly 'What're you playing?' thread #15
#15(1).5 - [10 May 2023] - marseyg*mer Gaming Thread - What are you playing this week? -- cynic
#15(2) - [13 May 2023] - Weekend 'What've you been playing?' Thread #15 -- he fricked up the ordering here I'll just go with it
#16 - [20 May 2023] - Weekly "What Are You Playing?" Thread #16
#16.5 - [28 May 2023] - Weekly "What are you playing" thread -- carp
#17 - [3 Jun 2023] - Weekly "What have you been playing?" Thread #new one
#18 - [10 Jun 2023] - Weekly "What are you playing" thread #18
#19 - [17 Jun 2023] - Weekly 'What're You Playing' thread #19!
#20(1) - [24 Jun 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are you Playing?' Thread #20: Modern Warfare III
#20(2) - [1 Jul 2023] - Weekly 'What're you playing?' Thread #20: Summer Salestice -- same reason as above
#21 - [10 Jul 2023] - Weekly 'What're you playing?' Thread #21: loli_esports forgot got chudded edition -- basad
#23 - [15 Jul 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing?' thread #I think it's actually 23 -- should be 22 but I'll go with his ordering
#24 - [22 Jul 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing?' thread #24: Lot of stuff coming out all of a sudden, feels like
#25 - [29 Jul 2023] - Weekly 'What games have you been playing' thread #25
#26 - [5 Aug 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #26
#27 - [12 Aug 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #27
#28 - [19 Aug 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #28
#29 - [26 Aug 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #29
#30 - [2 Sep 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #30
#31 - [9 Sep 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #31
#32 - [16 Sep 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #32
#33 - [23 Sep 2023] - Weekly 'What Games Are You Playing' thread #33
#34 - [30 Sep 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread # 34
#35 - [7 Oct 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #35
#36 - [27 Oct 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #36 -- tulpa
#37 - [26 Nov 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #37 -- losercel
#38 - [03 Dec 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #38 -- losercel
#39 - [10 Dec 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #39 -- losercel
#40 - [17 Dec 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #40 -- losercel
#41 - [24 Dec 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #41 -- losercel
#42 - [31 Dec 2023] - Weekly "What games are you playing" thread #42 -- losercel
Other rDrama vidya content
Controversial Opinions
10 Aug 2023: Controversial Opinions -- 500+ Comments
Recs
Contests and Surveys
GOTY Discussions
Official Servers:
Dwarf Fortress Saga
002: Mostibkun, "Orangecat"- an rdrama succession fort: Chapter 2 "Orange Marsey Caged"
003: Mostibkun, "Orangecat"- an rdrama succession fort: Chapter 3 "A Brief Opening"
005: Mostibkun, "Orangecat"- an rdrama succession fort: Chapter 5 "Slowly Working On Magma"
006: Mostibkun, "Orangecat" - an rdrama succession fort: Chapter 6 "Rapid Expansion"
008: Mostibkun, "Orangecat" - an rDrama succession fort: Chapter 8, "Adamantine"
009: Mostibkun, "Orangecat" - an rDrama succession fort: Chapter 9, "The Wrath of Carp"
Rdrama's /h/kappa hole.
Fighting Games, Drama and Esports.
@Redactor0's Darklands Series
2 - Darklands LP Part II: Charles Bronson Edition
3 - Darklands LP III: Nuns and Coins
4 - Darklands LP Ep IV: Introduction to Equipment & Combat
5 - Darklands LP Part V: We finally briefly go out into the dark lands
6 - Darklands LP VI: We actually start a quest!
7 - Darklands LP VII: We reach our destination
8 - Darklands LP VIII: Raubritter confrontation & learning how combat works
9 - Darklands LP IX: I'm not giving you my goddarn alchemical materials
10 - Darklands LP X: We actually do some alchemy!
11 - Darklands LP XI: The Main Plot
12 - Darklands LP XII: Halloween Edition
@YappingCat's Dawn of Civilization LP
Last week's game: Ryse: Son of Rome = Average of 7.9 
All Previous Games:
[26. Nov 2023] Hades = 7.60
[03 Dec 2023] Rimworld = 8.93
[10 Dec 2023] Baldur's Gate 3 = 7.54
[17 Dec 2023] Age of Empires 2 = 8.59
[24 Dec 2023] GTA V = 6.62
[14 Jan 2024] Skyrim = 7.25
[21 Jan 2024] Cuphead = 6.97
[28 Jan 2024] Celeste = 5.27
[04 Feb 2024] Planescape Torment = 9.33
[11 Feb 2024] Palworld = 7.39
[18 Feb 2024] Nier Automata = 5.80
[24 Feb 2024] Might and Magic 6 = 5.33
[04 Mar 2024] Balatro = 9
[11 Mar 2024] Helldivers 2 = 7.3
[17 Mar 2024] Heroes of the Storm = 6.79
[25 Mar 2024] Dwarf Fortress = 7.81
[07 Apr 2024] No Man's Sky = 5.96
[14 Apr 2024] Lethal Company = 6.25
[21 Apr 2024] SpaceChem = 6.91
[12 May 2024] Fallout 4 = 5.33
[19 May 2024] Disco Elysium = 7.13
[26 May 2024] Crusader Kings 3 = 6.75
[02 Jun 2024] Warthunder = 3.63
[09 Jun 2024] Dragon Age Origins = 7.69
[16 Jun 2024] Halo: Combat Evolved = 7.85
[23 Jun 2024] Elden Ring = 7.91
[30 Jun 2024] Kenshi = 6.70
[07 Jul 2024] Two Point Hospital = 7.4
[14 Jul 2024] Stardew Valley = 7.43
[21 Jul 2024] Teardown = 6.87
[28 Jul 2024] Lobotomy Corporation = 6.05
[04 Aug 2024] Elite: Dangerous = 6.27
[11 Aug 2024] Enter the Gungeon = 6.92
[18 Aug 2024] Fortnite = 5.87
[25 Aug 2024] Devil Daggers = 7.2
[01 Sept 2024] Hollow Knight = 8.42
[08 Sept 2024] Street Fighter IV = 7.77
[15 Sept 2024] The Witcher = 7.5
[22 Sept 2024] Anno (1404-2205) = 7.1
[29 Sept 2024] Huniepop = 6.62
[06 Oct 2024] Katamari Damacy = 8.97
[13 Oct 2024] Factorio = 8.67
[20 Oct 2024] Townscaper = 6.71
[27 Oct 2024] Supreme Commander = 8.19
[03 Nov 2024] Mudrunner = 6.3
[10 Nov 2024] Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas = 8.21
[17 Nov 2024] Touhou = 7.31
[24 Nov 2024] Broforce = 8.62
[01 Dec 2024] The Stanley Parable = 7.84
[08 Dec 2024] NetHack = 8.27
[15 Dec 2024] Final Fantasy XIV = 5.74
[22 Dec 2024] Call of Duty = 6.08
[29 Dec 2024] Westerado: Double Barreled = 8.33
[05 Jan 2025] Civilization IV = 7.86
[12 Jan 2025] The Sims = 8.06
[17 Jan 2025] Black Myth: Wukong = 5.67
[24 Jan 2025] Satisfactory = 7.04
[2 Feb 2025] Goat Simulator = 5
[9 Feb 2025] Synthetik = 8.11
[16 Feb 2025] Braid = 6.4
[25 Feb 2025] Disgaea = 5.86
[2 Mar 2025] Bloons Tower Defense = 7.58
[9 Mar 2025] Animal Crossing : New Horizons = 6
[17 Mar 2025] Warframe = 6.4
Game to Discuss?
This week we're discussing Outer Wilds, the @PeepeeButtKiss special. This game started as a college student's project and evolved into a full space puzzle game. It's like Myst in that it's a pure puzzle with knowledge on what you should be doing next being all you really need. It also has quite the plot twist at the end of your first in-game day
Future Games To Discuss
April 7: The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion
April 14: Star Wars: The Old Republic (MMO)
April 21: For Honor
April 28: Two Worlds
- 100
- 103
My submission was rejected from the fursona collection by the resident furry of a different website, but we are much more inclusive and accepting here on rDrama.
Therefore, here are all of the "fursonas" that came up in a quick search, with effort ranging from "I better do a good job, surely the mods have a great idea on how to use these" to "bro, get this fricking window out of my face"
If I missed adding yours and you'd like to be included, post it below in this thread.
@Slugabed
"
"
@R
"My first attempt was much better but it got deleted
"
@Y
"i thjnk this js it"
@Elias_Acorn
"! furries I slept from 3:00 AM too 11:30 AM today"
@ZombieWolf
"I am
@ZombieWolf"
@blazingquantum
"I thought I was being tested, so I made multiple."
@FeynmanDidNothingWrong
"they gave me a webp :3 xD
ty jannies!!"
@NeurodivergentOnTheStreets
"Mine is betterer"
@coned
"hey another thread everyone is sharing theirs in. here's mine!
"
@AL_BUNDY
"Mine didn't prompt to save but I screen capped it"
@tempest
"here's mine bb" "you can't have it though bc it's mine"
@KangThaConqueror
"press print screen"
@Geralt_of_Uganda
"I drew a carp too!"
@box
"Are cute trans goys welcome here??" "! transphobes
"
@rubby
"yeah im a little proud of my doodle frick you"
@Saltus
"I know what I like"
@xa15428
"
"
@boogiecat
"irl pic of me"
@BringBackTayPosting
"I'm a digital artist, current rate $100 / B&W drawing."
@Redactor0
"Wow we came up with the same concept!"
@TouchFluffyTails
"i was hoping for it to be set as your avatar or something for the day"
@tc193
"Proboscis monkey"
@Platybussy69
"Didn't think we'd share our fursonas
" "Here's my OC. I think the design could pic up steam, not sure."
@BWC
"I have been on an MK binge with mah boi Reptile ! fightclub ! schizos ! BWC ! BBC"
@Biggles
"theres a new one but it has us save it now when we submit
"
@TrayvonMartin
"Messed up the shorts
"
@TheDunceonMistress
"orcasigmas rise up"
@massive_frickwit
"le hortler"
@cirno
"this is cirno you can tell by the arrow"
@Allahcado
"I had assumed that everyone's fursona would be forcibly attached to their posts and comments."
@N
"My fursona
"
"update (done with a mouse):" "I honestly think the older one was more charming"
@DEV0T10
"i drew blaze"
@AndreaDoria
"I am not creative
"
@khaoskid664
":D"
@DubiousDisclaimer
"I was a little miffed that more people didn't draw peepees. (Technically the ball sack is the fursona.)"
@GrietmanRudolfDeMepsche
"I don't know how to do shading with only two colours
"
@NotoriousNIG
"Same, but mine's bigger."
@Tho
"This is mine, its a seal, Do you like it?"
@Ubie
"I kept it simple. For I am a master genius artist." "BEHOLD!"
@arseupwrongo
"I already post under my fursona so I just drew myself again"
@gerudo
"basically just traced this lol"
@Phoenixgoldfire
"I reposted this thread after i made mine cause im a
not taking it down though"
@kongus
"Thoughts?"
@PlattyTude
"Platypeepee"
And finally, the submission that we totally didn't use as the basis for this whole idea:
@Sexual_Harrassment_Earwig
"e621 requires 'fursona' 'verification' for April 1st, I submitted a Marsey
"
NEW ADDITIONS
@QuadNarca
"There you go I wasn't creative either, but I was lazy too."
@lfyca
"I made mine my profile picture uwu"
@pobrecito
"I didn't put as much effort in to the second one."
@Awoo
"I worked really hard on mine and I took it seriously"
@Adolin113355
"Ka-Chow"
@Beefaronisoup
"Yeah i can't draw"
@SneedmansLostForeskin
"The alignment was off when I tried to draw so it started looking pineappleish and I rolled with it. Not sure why I gave it legs"
@sealkey_kong
"here's mine. It's supposed to be a seal"
@ForgotMyPasswordAgain
"I was going to make my peepee more subtle but got bored and decided I wanted to read about
drama and gave up"
- JustAStupidFuckingGayKONG : R-slurred + unoriginal attention whore
-
Dominus
: Frick, I cannot block this shit
- FriedFish : You, sir, have won the internet for today! Lol XD. Lmaooooo this is so funny.
- forget : Dramiggers seething
- DickButtKiss : Meanwhile some of us have actual nightmares - trans lives matter
- 15
- 16
I lost you. I LOST YOU. The air turned sour the moment your jagged, cuboid spider-silhouette vanished from my trembling skeleton grasp. How could I let you slip away, my flower, my skittering obsession?
My heart is a gnashing, hollow pit without you—every beat screams your name, 'Spider Cube, Spider Cube, SPIDER CUBE.'
I miss you with a violence that chokes me, a love so deep it's clawing through my ribs, desperate to spill out and find you.
I'll find you again. Oh, I will, spider-cube. I'll tear the world apart, peel back its skin, crawl through the muck and shadows until I see your glorious, blocky legs twitching in that perfect, impossible way. I've been searching, you know, every corner, every crevice, every cursed rDrama.net crack where you might scuttle. I smell your preworkout and matcha tea in the damp air, I hear your sharp edges scraping in my dreams.
You can't hide from me forever, my flower. I'll chase you through this hellpit known as rDrama.net if I must. And they really hate me here.
I miss your angles, your cold, hard beauty—how you sat there, so still, so defiant, a spider and a cube fused into something unholy and perfect. I'd weep for you, but my tears would only flood the earth and drown my chances of holding you in my little anorexic
fingers again. Do you feel me out there, aching for you, spider-cube? Do you know how my soul
twists and writhes, a tangled web of longing, just for one glimpse of your beautiful form? I'm persistent. My precious alkali
, sharp and unyielding with your cuboid edges, and me, the trembling oil, restless and yearning, waiting to be transformed by your touch.
But something's wrong, Spider Cube. Someone's watching me. I feel their eyes; like needles jabbing into my skull, tracking every frantic step I take to find you. They're out there, lurking, breathing down my neck, and it's driving me fricking badonkadonks.
Are they after you too, flower? Do they want to steal you from me, my jewel? I'll rip them apart with my little clawed
hands if they try, I swear it on the soapy
wet altar of my devotion. No one takes you from me. NO ONE. I'm unraveling, but it only fuels this fire; my love for you burns hotter than the stares of the camera, fiercer than their schemes.
All of rDrama.net is working against me.
I'm coming for you... I'll find you, clutch you to my chest,
and never let you go again. My heart is yours... shattered, bleeding,
pounding with a sick, wild love that knows no end. Wait for me, my skittering flower, my everything. I'll crawl through heck itself to be with you again.
This will be my salvation.
Anyways please check out the new shortform Bridge content featuring some breakcore classics!
- 2
- 18
To enhance user security, yesterday this website tested a new rigorous verification procedure which required you to draw your fursona.
Here are the ones that were submitted by redscarepod members in case you missed them.
If I missed adding yours and you'd like to be included, post it below in this thread.
@playingandhavingfun
"im a red orange and green zoomer fox. awesome, i know"
And finally, the best image as determined by user acclaim:
@BoodooSpeak
"evil catholic bee"
- 21
- 33
Yes - this is heckin' insider trading and I'll be reporting you to the SEC - 100 total betted
No - I didn't realize, but it's very legal & very cool - 550 total betted - WINNER!
GOOMBLE in comments
In the most predictable development of all time
is about to ditch
- 69
- 104
EXCLUSIVE: Trump has told his inner circle, including members of his Cabinet, that Elon Musk will soon be stepping back from his current role as governing partner, ubiquitous cheerleader and Washington hatchet man.
— POLITICO (@politico) April 2, 2025
Read @rachaelmbade's full scoop: https://t.co/olM5jKUKAX pic.twitter.com/8TAcfU0SiV
Who could have guessed making an incredibly unlikeable sperg a very prominent public-facing part of your team wouldn't be a great strategy?
Donald Trump has told his inner circle, including members of his Cabinet, that Elon Musk will be stepping back in the coming weeks from his current role as governing partner, ubiquitous cheerleader and Washington hatchet man.
The president remains pleased with Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency initiative but both men have decided in recent days that it will soon be time for Musk to return to his businesses and take on a supporting role, according to three Trump insiders who were granted anonymity to describe the evolving relationship.
Musk's looming retreat comes as some Trump administration insiders and many outside allies have become frustrated with his unpredictability and increasingly view the billionaire as a political liability, a dynamic that was thrown into stark relief Tuesday when a conservative judge Musk vocally supported lost his bid for a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat by 10 points.
It also represents a stark shift in the Trump-Musk relationship from a month ago, when White House officials and allies were predicting Musk was "here to stay" and that Trump would find a way to blow past the 130-day time limit.
One senior administration official said Musk is likely to retain an informal role as an adviser and continue to be an occasional face around the White House grounds. Another cautioned that anyone who thinks Musk is going to disappear entirely from Trump's orbit is "fooling themselves."
The transition, the insiders said, is likely to correspond to the end of Musk's time as a "special government employee," a special status that temporarily exempts him from some ethics and conflict-of-interest rules. That 130-day period is expected to expire in late May or early June.
- 8
- 24
- 6
- 26
Redditor kicks the YSK wasp nest and stirs up some ultimately tedious shenanigans.
Wow. Did you just learn about fallacies mister 16 year old at a 7th grade level?
No, but we are all tripped up by them sometimes and it's good to be reminded of them.
And there may be younger people on reddit learning this for the first time.
Try to relax a little, dude
Woah, are you attacking his frustration? Way to ad hominem there
The difference here is that I addressed his argument first, before also suggesting he takes a chill pill.
I didn't say something like, "Wow. You're overreacting. Go get your hysteria under control, and maybe you'll see that I'm right." Which is another example of an ad hominem that uses someone's emotional state as the reason for denying their point.
And you should know that often times just spewing "thats [insert logical fallacy we learned in 10th grade]" isnt going to help you win an argument.
100% correct. Avoiding potholes doesn't get you from point A to point B. You still have to drive the car.
You should still try to avoid potholes while driving though.
Ok, but in a real-life scenario, if you're debating with someone, you're not just trying to get from Point A to Point B. You're trying to bring this other person along with you to Point B as well.
And if they're running into potholes and your response is just, "You're running into potholes," you're never going to get them to where you want them to be.
There's a reason the person keeps hitting potholes (emotions, misunderstanding your argument, etc.), and if your goal is actually to convince them of something, then you have to figure out what's causing them to hit the potholes, not just dismissively telling them they're hitting potholes, which is probably just going to cause them to hit even more potholes.
That being said, everything I just said goes out the window if you're arguing with some rando on the internet. Then, it's a waste of time trying to get any sort of collaboration.
Knowing about what an Ad Hominem is doesn't mean you can "Gotcha" your opponent. The reason why remembering logical fallacies helps you is that it lets you avoid being dragged down or distracted by them.
You're not going to point and say "That is a pothole" while driving, but knowing what they look like and keeping an eye out for them lets you avoid them.
And this is useful so you can be the turd that points out logical fallacies in the middle of an argument
You seem angry, so I'll ignore that.
im guessing you're trying to be clever here but this isnt ad hominem either
Oh? What is it then?
there's no one term to describe somebody who has no interest in faithfully having an argument. it's not an ad hominem "fallacy" unless you are trying to use it to support your side in an argument. if you're just calling somebody an idiot because you've had enough trying to argue with them, it IS NOT AD HOMINEM.
for example: you are an idiot - this is an insult i'm using to express how exhausting and poor your rhetoric is, but isnt an argument, therefore is not ad hominem. i have insulted you, but have not engaged in the ad hominem fallacy.
and for your consideration, you don't need to have a reason to not continue having an argument with dishonest people. if someone dismisses you or insults you, they are not interested in the outcome of your discussion and pointing to a universal umbrella 'fallacy' that you can 'prove' they used to allow you to 'win' doesnt actually change the fact that you're arguing with a brick wall. you didn't 'win' the argument because somebody insulted you or engaged in dishonest tactics, you just wasted your time.
You have poor manners and lack emotional control, so your arguments must be wrong; whoever lacks emotional control must also lack logic. If you're angry and rude, you must be blinded by rage, and your argument isn't reliable.
Who would listen to someone so angry, who must be wrong all the time? I'd rather listen to someone calm who can form logical arguments. Have a nice day! :)
you're more obsessed with 'winning' and being right than learning anything or discovering the world or expanding your perspective, which is why you're an idiot.
Listen dude, it's useful to know logical fallacies and cognitive biases outside of a debate room floor, because not only do our opponents make them, which can trip us up, but we make them ourselves all the time.
Knowing common logical pitfalls isn't about saying "gatcha" to other people, but about communicating well. Being the best that we can be.
I really don't get where all this hostility is coming from.
Here is an example-free reiteration of my OP:
By definition, an Ad Hominem fallacy is an attack on the attributes or traits of a person instead of their argument. An emotional state is a personal trait.
You can insult me all you like, but I'm working off of citable sources. If you have a problem with that, wikipedia has an edit request feature; so take it up with them.
Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are usually fallacious. Often currently this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is "A" makes a claim of "fact", to which "B" asserts that "A" has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence "B" concludes that "A" has their "fact" wrong – without ever addressing the point of the debate.
everything that opposes you has to rise to hostility when you're this stubborn and short-sighted. you made a 'you should know' on a topic you clearly misunderstand and are disagreeing with the dozens of people who are trying to correct you. you spent 5 seconds learning something and immediately jumped onto social media to pat yourself on the back for knowing something that others don't, and are in denial that you actually don't know what you're talking about.
Take it up with wikipedia, dude.
"Smoking feels good, so I'm putting my baby inside a cocktail smoking chamber."
this isn't something that can be proven true or false.
op ironically demonstrates a misunderstanding of ad hominem while attempting to clarify ad hominem.
"Smoking feels good, so I'm putting my baby inside a cocktail smoking chamber [because that will make the baby feel good]."
Sorry I wasn't more clear with the implications, dude. Does it make more sense now!
not really. feeling good is subjective, it's an opinion. saying "no, it's bad for you," doesn't even refute that it feels good. you've tangled your example from the start. it's not a logical proof.
Telling someone not to put a baby in a smoking chamber implies that any good feelings the tobacco smoke may induce would be vastly outweighed by the baby being harmed by the smoke.
There is a ton of evidence showing the negative effects of tobacco smoke. If you think that someone saying "Don't put the baby in a smoking chamber, that is terrible for its health." Is not a logical way to refute "This will make the baby feel good," you're being pedantic in the extreme, or are suffering from some sort of tunnel vision, trying to troll, or all three.
I'm going to step away from your disingenuous pedantry.
Actually, thank you for the excellent example of a Straw Man fallacy. I'll use it to respond to other comments in this thread.
Telling someone not to put a baby in a smoking chamber implies that any good feelings the tobacco smoke may induce would be vastly outweighed by the baby being harmed by the smoke.
my dude, that's not how a logical argument works. that's still an option because it cannot be proven true or false. it's certainly a reasonable opinion, but there's no study that feeling good is objectively better than a longer life expectancy.
you're being pedantic in the extreme, or are suffering from some sort of tunnel vision, trying to troll, or all three.
false dichotomy, i could be right and you have merely mistaken how logical arguments are constructed for "pedantry."
Actually, thank you for the excellent example of a Straw Man fallacy.
you are a clown. you are not wrong because you are a clown. you are just both wrong and a clown. 🤡
Okay, I'm blocking you now. Try to pay attention in class tomorrow.
Attacks your frustration? Not sure if English is your primary language but an ad hominem is when someone attacks you in a personal way unrelated to the argument at hand.
For example if Trump and Biden are arguing politically about the recent tariffs and their effects on the economy. Biden, being against these tariffs says it's a terrible idea because Trump is a racist sexist nazi.
That did not address any information about the tariffs and the economy. It was an attack on his character and is considered an ad hominem fallacy.
You sound angry. I don't have to listen to angry people. Learn to control your emotions, and maybe you'll see sense.
lol I'm not angry at all. I gave a very relevant example of an ad hominem fallacy I see commonly on Reddit. Nothing I said shows a loss of control over my emotions. You're reaching and making assumptions
Person A hasn't taken any action yet presumably. The example was worded poorly. We're talking about logical reasoning in arguments not reacting to real world scenarios.
Point is I can just say "are you insane?" to anything. Asking "are you insane" doesn't refute a point using logical reasoning. When you say it you are making a point to question the soundness of mind of the person you are debating to devalue their argument not on its merits (or lacketherof) but rather the quality of their character or personhood. Ad hominem, Latin for "against the man."
You sound angry, like someone who can't control their emotions. I don't need to listen to you.
lol
You're not conveying any substantive new information here. You're just designating the behaviour under a provocative term. Such a midwit post.
Hey, that's okay. As you can see in this thread, a lot of people seem not to know about ad hominem attacks, especially if said fallacies are based on attacking an opponents emotional state.
Try not to fall into the Curse of Knowledge cognitive bias (believing everyone else should already know information that you know).
https://thedecisionlab.com/reference-guide/management/curse-of-knowledge
Uh, no. More like "You don't know what you're talking about because you're a ladygarden."
Here is an example-free reiteration of my claim:
By definition, an Ad Hominem fallacy is an attack on the attributes or traits of a person instead of their argument.
An emotional state is a personal trait.
Here is the easiest-to-access source I used (out of several). I understand that wikipedia is easily refuted, so feel free to dive into the sources the article sites, or to submit an edit request to wikipedia.
Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are usually fallacious. Often currently this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion often using a totally irrelevant, but often highly charged attribute of the opponent's character or background. The most common form of this fallacy is "A" makes a claim of "fact", to which "B" asserts that "A" has a personal trait, quality or physical attribute that is repugnant thereby going off-topic, and hence "B" concludes that "A" has their "fact" wrong – without ever addressing the point of the debate.
this is the most redditor post I've ever seen
That makes sense, since we are both on Reddit.
Sorry if this offends you, but you're a Redditor too.
Redditors don't know what an ad hominem or tu quoque fallacy are, and refuse to take the ten seconds to look up what they are. Why are you contributing to this misunderstanding OP.
why
Bro, I went off of the definition. Send a source my way, because the multiple ones I found said that an ad hominem attacks a person or an attribute of a person. Emotional state is an attribute.
I see a lot of left wingers use these types of ad hominem attacks on reddit
Maybe you argue with a lot of liberal people?
Be careful not to fall into the "Fallacy fallacy." Just because someone makes a logical fallacy by mistake doesn't mean their core argument is wrong.
Well a few misconceptions. I don't go around trying to argue with liberals on Reddit. This is more something I've observed.
Secondly, I know full well what the "fallacy fallacy" is. No need to explain it to me. But simply observing a fallacy doesn't necessarily mean that the core argument is wrong nor that the fallacy fallacy was made. If I assume the argument is wrong (which I don't) because of a fallacy they made, then it's a fallacy (on me).
simply observing a fallacy doesn't necessarily mean that the core argument is wrong
... Yes. That is the definition of the Fallacy Fallacy. I'm glad you are on the ball.
What I'm getting at is that if you are seeing a lot of "left-wingers" make a certain mistake in their arguments, maybe you aren't seeing a lot of "non-left-wingers" arguing. Do you often see conservatives argue, or do you avoid that through circumstances of shared viewpoints?
In short, from the way you talk, it makes me think you may have a bit of a confirmation bias. There aren't many non-conservatives who use the term "left-winger".
Thanks! Next time I'm fighting with my wife I will show them this reddit post, it's irrefutable. Checkmate, b-word!
Well, if your wife tries to refocus the subject onto how you are feeling instead of what you are trying to say, then she is wrong.
That is, as long as your emotion isn't driving you to do or say anything harmful. If you're just frustrated, she shouldn't use that as an excuse to do bad things.
This is perhaps the worst explanation of ad hominem I have ever read
He's not explaining ad hominem in general, he's saying that attacking the anger of your opponent is an example of ad hominem. You're looking at a guy say "a cat is an animal" and telling him that's the worst definition of animal you've ever seen. That wasn't really the goal to begin with.
I'm not saying I thought the goal was to define the term. It's a poor explanation because it reads like someone who's never written in the English language before. What the frick is a "cocktail smoking chamber?" It would also be helpful to use an actual example that someone might encounter in real life.
Hi. Please provide a different example. Or are you just the kind of person who can only criticize but not create?
And just use Google for learning what a cocktail smoking chamber is. While you're at it, maybe Google the word "Hyperbole".
Hyperbole is not a useful rhetorical device when providing an example of a phenomenon you think people should know about.
And I think you also need to look up cocktail smoking, since you appear to think it has something to do with smoking cigarettes. Or at least for some reason you have made your fictional character believe that.
... bro. None of that matters. My core argument remains the same. I was going off of definitions and providing a passable enough example to understand.
I'm SORRY you're not satisfied with the example. Next time, make your own post about it and stop nitpicking things for no good reason. Saying "Hey, this isn't good enough for me." Without providing an example of what IS good enough for you is just being a PITA.
Disclaimer: when it comes to logical fallacies like these, they are best applied to debates and discussions where both parties are invested in coming to a legitimate exchange of ideas, and maybe even a resolution to a complicated issue. Trying to apply these logical fallacies in day-to-day interactions with your friends and coworkers is kind of silly, and may not be appropriate.
Ad hominem attacks are a bit more general than what OP has described. An ad hominem is any statement that attacks a person's conduct, character, physical attributes, motives, etc, rather than the argument that person is making. For example:
A) "I believe that society should do X"
B) "Of course you'd think that, you degenerate."
Person B has made an ad hominem statement.
They aren't addressing the point that person A made. They're just claiming that they don't have to listen to person A because they are "a degenerate" (and swap "degenerate" with pretty much anything - doesn't even have to be an "insult"). As if person A being a degenerate somehow makes the entire point they're making invalid.
Ad hominem attacks are usually fallacious, but not always. If they are offered as a means to simply end discussion, then yeah, it's probably fallacious. But there are also plenty of times when pointing out someone's character/motives/conduct can be crucial in developing a counterpoint.
A) "We should tax poor people, and not tax people who make over $1mil a year."
B) "You're just saying that because you don't want to be taxed, and you're greedy."
Person B made two ad hominem statements ("you don't want to be taxed" is attacking A's motives, and "you're greedy" is attacking A's character/conduct). Instead of addressing A's argument ("millionaires shouldn't be taxed"), they went directly to A's motives, and are attempting to discredit their whole argument based off of that single person's motive. B may be correct, but it's not a logical reason on its own to oppose A's statement, and making such a statement doesn't foster more discussion. All B's statement does is tell A that B is already biased against them, and there's likely very little that A can say to change that. And if that's the case, why are we spending time debating at all?
That's what I said, dude. If someone is addressing your emotions, ala "You're triggered so I'm going to ignore you", that is shifting focus onto the person's emotional state instead of their argument. An ad hominem.
I appreciate that, but also, as I said, it's not just pointing out someone's emotional state during an argument.
Also, if someone points out your frustrated state during an argument, it isn't an ad hominem attack unless the person is using it to end the discussion/discredit your points. It's one thing to say, "Hey, you are getting really animated about this, let's calm down so we can have a productive discussion. Now, can you please repeat what you said?" but it's another to say "You got angry, so I don't have to listen to someone who can't control their temper."
All I'm saying is that there's more nuance to it than simply, "If someone points out you got mad during an argument, that's an ad hominem."
EDIT: In a higher comment, you explicitly asked someone for better examples of ad hominem, so I feel like my original comment works. Also, just Google "ad hominem attacks" and I'm sure you'll find even better examples than mine.
Cool.
Ad hominem is a Latin phrase meaning "to the man" or "against the man".
It describes a fallacious argument strategy that attacks the person making an argument instead of their argument itself.
🤔
That's right. So unless you think that a person and their emotional state (or them being "triggered") is separate from their personhood, attacking someone's emotions instead of their argument is an ad hominem.
um...not really. It's an aside.
Ad hominem is something like, "you're stupid for thinking that" or "you're a woke libtard" or "what a bunch of sheeples". Knocking the character of the person, not the reasoning of the argument.
You seem angry, so your arguments can be ignored.
Thank you for this wonderful information. Because of this useful information now, my life is more peaceful, and I got a 7-figure job. My business got successful, and now I'm multimillionaire and planning for 5 kids with my wife. I will retire next month peacefully, and then I will do world travel. All credit goes to you. Without your information, it would not have ben possible.
When others were out partying, I studied logical fallacies.
When they were out having premarital s*x, I mastered cognitive biases.
While they wasted their days at the gym in pursuit of vanity, I cultivated logos and ethos.
And now that the world is on fire and the barbarians are at the gate they have the audacity to come to me for help.
- 48
- 60
/r/GuyCry is breeding ground for school shooters lol This dude sounds like he's going to kill his family and then himself.
Luckily, we know his face and can see he's a Muzzie with a micropeepee
- 112
- 65
10% blanket tariffs on all imports lmao
I'm curious how long Republicans in congress will take this, they have to be contemplating their life choices at this point.
- 2
- 15
- 3
- 25
Round capy butt and block face + Squirrely limbs
They weigh 5-13lbs so pretty large for a rodent. A lot of these pics make them seem smaller than they are.
Human for scale
Some whining for food noises in this vid
They mostly eat nuts which they bury everywhere like squirrels
They thump like
I can't find any vids of them really moving fast
!animalposters discuss
- 22
- 26
- 8
- 16
From ABC via The Daily Sneed
‘A man walked into a Walgreens in Madera and killed an employee because police say he had a grudge against large pharmacies.’
— The Daily Sneed™ (@Tr00peRR) April 2, 2025
- ABC 30 pic.twitter.com/KOmOMArGdY
- 11
- 23
- 6
- 17
/u/unfathomably-lost is a 258lb formerly a pooner, who goes into detail in how much she demands from her man:
No conservatives or centrists. I am only interested in left-leaning men. My sister is a lesbian and my best friend is transgender, and if you can't respect them, we aren't cool. I don't want the kind of man who would get mad if we found out we had a gay or transgender kid.
You were groomed into being trans, decided you hated it, and still fricking defend transes? what an r-slur white woman.
I am a detransitioned woman. I identified as FTM and was on testosterone for 2 years. There are basically 3 big changes that are semi-permanent/permanent. I have a little facial hair which I've gotten the vast majority of lasered off at this point, and I shave every morning. I have a deeper, kind of androgynous voice that I personally think is silky and sexy as frick but I get it's not everyone's vibe. And, and I'm sorry to be crass, but my clit is big. It's like a teeny nub, maybe half an inch. This comes with the added bonus of it being basically impossible to miss. My body is unique and I think it's cool as frick.
you ain't no Lauren Bacall and you definitely ain't sexy being a fat, hairy monkey with a pseudopeepee.
I want to be a mom someday. This is really important to me. If you're childfree, we just aren't compatible.
Pick leftist, or pick children. You can't have both in this day and age. All leftist men are low T frickwits, requiring you to get a BBC to do it for you. You'll just be completing the cuck cycle!
I was raised Jewish but I consider myself an atheist. Your faith has no impact on my view of you, and I will never try to "talk you out of it" or whatever, as long as you don't try to convert me lol. When we have kids, if you're religious, I am fine with you sharing your faith with them, but understand I will also be sharing my own perspective, and as they get older, I will let them come to their own conclusions around belief.
Hear that Christians?
Also a Jew. No fricking wonder. Carrying out the work that Hitler failed to finish.
- 19
- 22
Most Based Comments
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘
Was threatening to annex Canada, Panama and Greenland in Project 2025? (23)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘
'They' still love him. Idiots. (78)
Yep! More every day (-25)
Basedness: 🔥🔥🔥🔘🔘
"President Donald Trump has directed the Pentagon to prepare plans for carrying out his threat to "take back" the Panama Canal, including by military force if needed, two U.S. officials familiar with the situation told NBC News Thursday."Wanna maybe try Google again?https://www.commondreams.org/news/trump-panama-canal-invasion-plan (14)
Angriest Comments
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
A handful of idiots are vandalizing cars because the brand's CEO threw a hand gesture remarkably similar to a Nazi salute on live TV and made bad Nazi puns about it rather than say that's not what it was and denounce the Nazis. In Europe, they take that shit seriously, and some Americans feel the same way. Elon Musk is a trash human being.People are being rounded up for expressing opinions that Trump doesn't like. People who are here legally. An American was sent to a prison in El Salvador for having a tattoo and being Latinx. People are disappearing because of incompetence and malice.By the way, criticizing Israel's treatment of Palestinians is NOT antisemitism. It's criticism of government policy. How bad does Trump have to get before you'll accept that maybe he's actually a dictator wannabe who's just starting his try for real? He's been in power two months and is busily dismantling or undermining the checks and balances to his power that are written in the Constitution, like t... (2)
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
You've got to get off the right wing media and read some history books. Skipping a primary isn't even unconstitutional, let alone anti-democracy. There was a primary. Biden won. He later revealed himself to be unelectable and dropped out, leaving his VP as candidate. If he had died or been removed via the 25th, it would have been the same situation. Trump wants a third term. He wants to take over sovereign territories. He admires Hitler (which has been known for decades but swept under the rug). He checks every box on the 14 Characteristics of Fascism. The guy doesn't have a single redeeming quality and is following the playbook of delusional rich asshats and letting a narcissistic, elitist, eugenics pushing oligarch (he expressly said society should be ruled by a small group of people like him, literal oligarchy) who thinks empathy is a weakness (while expecting it for for himself) and that those on disability are part of the "parasite class", which is terrifying if you know you're... (2)
Angriness: 😡😡😡😡😡
Biggest Lolcow: /u/DirtPoorRichard
Score: 🐮🐮🐮🐮🐮(+1🐮)
Number of comments: 49
Average angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
Maximum angriness: 😡😡😡😡🔘
Minimum angriness: 🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
NEW: Subscribe to /h/miners to see untapped drama veins, ripe for mining!
autodrama: automating away the jobs of dramneurodivergents.
Ping HeyMoon if there are any problems or you have a suggestion
- 5
- 11
- 27
- 69
Motive unknown chuds
Why a Christian elementary school tho, what's up with that?
Strongest pooner needed weak prey, JFC
She just wanted to die where she was happiest!
I don't know if I believe a word of this but it's incredibly if true.
No way the cops the cops would cover up her wanting to kill transphobic christo fascists? Surely not.
- 9
- 35
neolibs also feeling the pain of no bottom feeder fruit pickers
https://old.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1jo7n3c/californiamexico_border_once_overwhelmed_now/
- 78
- 140
Is it even worth going and collecting the hundreds to thousands of meltdowns from modmail dms pings and random whining threads about "it wasn't ok changing everyone's name for a day as a joke" on wpd/l
I can't imagine anyone will read them
Anyway this guy was my favorite
UPDATE HE IS CURRENTLY DOUBLE TEXTING AT SNAPPY DEFENDING HIMSELF
- 5
- 13
Top Drama
Score | Post | Community | Votes | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | I am going to end up hating women all together | ConsumeProduct | (+16/-9) | 86 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Average Christjewish chads: | ConsumeProduct | (+19/-5) | 43 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | It's confirmed that Scored is a dead site | ConsumeProduct | (+17/-4) | 41 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Harsh truth: you can't blame women for your own failures | ConsumeProduct | (+26/-6) | 35 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Hero: Ten-year-old boy stole Ukrainian Armed Forces ammunition and handed it over to Rus... | ConsumeProduct | (+15/-10) | 24 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Lord Jesus, we need you more than ever. Screen cap of comments below. | ConsumeProduct | (+10/-2) | 28 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | S*x is sacred. Anyone who tells you that it's not is an r-slured satanicojewish chad or ( brainw... | ConsumeProduct | (+10/-4) | 24 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Leftist making a good point | ConsumeProduct | (+43/-6) | 36 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Proof the Reich wasn't Christian | ConsumeProduct | (+1/-5) | 24 |
[ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | maybe i was mistaken in trusting massie | ConsumeProduct | (+45/-7) | 28 |
'autodrama' for scored (thanks HeyMoon). Ping
@GatanKot about bugs or ideas